Tagged: Privacy

My Online Privacy Has Reached a Tipping Point

 

After getting over my initial grumblings about Facebook’s recent format update, I actually got excited about the integration with one of my new favorite things: Spotify. I thought this would be great. There’s no good way to share music with your network other than listing the bands you like on your profile page. And this is a topic I consistently would like to share with people. 

Once I linked my two accounts, it took all of 5 seconds for me to realize it may have been a bad idea.

A couple days later….

Oh boy… this isn’t what I wanted at all.

It comes down to two things, and they’re not limited to the Spotify integration, but the entire “Read, Watch, Listen” push that Facebook is making (my concerns apply equally to any of the auto-sharing mechanisms Facebook is rolling out). I definitely want the ability to easily share, but what I don’t want are 1) too much clutter, and 2) no context.

More data doesn’t mean a better experience

The last thing Facebook needs is a mechanism to pump more information into people’s news feed. In fact, as the organization of Google+ would suggest, we’re getting to a point where the preference is for easier ways to filter information. Instead Facebook dumps a lot of inconsequential updates into the Ticker and leaves you to sort it out (or worse, they try to do it for you using some magic algorithm – like I trust that…).

The other thing that’s missing is how to use that data. Look again at how the Spotify integration works within my news feed. I listened to nearly 50 songs in a couple days – am I to expect my friends to sort through that entire list and see what they like? Doubtful. More likely is that would be ignored, like all those Farmville updates that plagued profiles for a while.

Just because I consume something doesn’t mean I endorse it

But the biggest issue I have is that there’s no context for my consumption of that music. I use Spotify to not only listen to my favorites but also to test out new artists or songs. However, the way it’s presented in Facebook, it appears as though I’m endorsing everything I’m listening to. And that list of songs inherently gets linked to my online persona, whether or not it’s an accurate representation of who I am.

What I would much rather have is a mechanism within Spotify to share the songs I want to – and provide commentary around that. For example, maybe while testing out a new artist, I come across something I love. That’s when I want to broadcast to my network what I found. Right now there’s no way for someone to know that I loved that artist, and hated the other five that popped up right next to it.

For Facebook, all of this data about what I’m consuming is great for their marketing partners. But it’s not great for the user. I had 50 songs come through in a couple days. My friends presumably see that, plus the 50 (or more or less) songs from the hundreds of other people in their networks. Now we’ve got thousands of songs being put out there with nothing more than the fact that someone listened to them. Helpful? Not really.

What I’d rather see is that data captured behind the scenes and presented to me in an aggregate way so I can get a glimpse at what is going on within my network. If 30 of my friends are listening to a particular song, I may check it out. But I won’t notice that kind of trend by seeing individual updates.

Or better yet, how about I self-select 10 or so friends (or however many you want) that I identify as influential to me. These are the people that I look to for tips on what’s hot (because let’s face it, all friends in our network aren’t created equal). Then I could see the aggregate activity of my entire network as well as the activity of my most influential friends.

Not only would this create a more useful user experience, it would also help Facebook and marketers to identify the true influentials (because they’d be identified by users) and provide an avenue for optimal micro-targeting.

I would also like to be able to filter the information that’s shared back to Facebook. The auto share is pushing the privacy envelope too far for me. I don’t have privacy concerns when I’m ultimately the one that decides to share something. But when it’s shared on my behalf, without a way for me to filter it, I simply won’t use it.

And this is Facebook’s biggest potential problem. People won’t use this. I got creeped out by Spotify after only a few days. And I was pumped to use that! No way I’m giving Facebook the ability to share every article I read, every mouse click I make. Nope, no thank you.

There’s some great potential here, but some serious checks and balances need to be put in place before it’s usable, in my opinion.

UPDATE: Spotify has rolled out a private listening feature that allows users to not publish every last song to their Facebook profile. That’s good. Now I can keep Spotify connected to Facebook, which I like because it allows me to see friends’ playlists (which they control whether it is shared or not). Nice job Spotify, you reacted well to the outcry and provided an acceptable solution. We’re BFF’s once again.

Share

Tracked By Your Smartphone

This week Apple has been on the hot seat because of tracking data stored on users’ iPhones. Data for a year would be stored on individual phones that synced to PCs (and back to Apple). Google does the same thing. Apple has officially come out with an apology/explanation and said it will right the wrong. But the real question is, is this as bad as it seems?

The corporate line is that this tracking data is stored in order to provide quicker geo-location support for apps that use the technology. Essentially, traditional GPS is too slow, so the phone relies on cell towers and wi-fi hotspots to triangulate location. Fine enough. But the problem for most seems to be the year-long record of all location data. And that someone else could conceivably see it. Gasp! I’m not saying that privacy is a trivial matter. It’s not. But let’s face it – as a society we long ago gave up the right to complete privacy the second we started plugging into the network. Cell phones have always been able to track location. Facebook and Twitter are integrating it into their platform. Hell, Foursquare is built on location.

Now the question seems to be, where do we draw the line? Are we ok if a company has our data, but only for a short time (i.e. a week vs. a year)? Or are we ok as long as we never hear about it (like if nobody ever found that iPhone file)? Or will this be the catalyst for new laws to govern the use and retention of location data?

I have a hard time believing location data will continue along unchecked by some sort of regulation, but I also don’t see it needing to be guarded along HIPAA lines. My guess is the resolution will be not very far from what Apple has voluntarily done. Some sort of regulation stipulating the length of time location data can be kept, what it can be used for, and only that de-identified data can be used.

The other big question is will this result in any consumer backlash to smartphone and other technology? The answer to that is a resounding no. Unfortunately, we want to have our cake and eat it too. We want all the benefits that location data enables, but we don’t want anyone to be able to access that data. Don’t expect a slowdown of smartphone adoption, or Facebook use, or anything else. That’s all here to stay, which is why I think we’ll ultimately get some legislation around how this data can be used. That’s why Senators Kerry and McCain have proposed an online privacy bill.

Overall I think this will turn out to be productive. May it be more restrictive for companies? Sure. Will it help engender consumer confidence? Perhaps. Ultimately this will benefit both sides and we’ll actually see more legitimate and useful uses of location-based and other data.

Share